Wednesday, Jan. 26, 2005 - 1:52 a.m.
niceguymike sent me a
note revealing
some insight into my last couple of posts. He brings up two issues:
1. What standards and boundaries am I setting (or not setting)?
2. What judgements am I making about my dates that are unfair or unjust?
I have always had only three criteria for men to meet before I will date them. Maybe that's my problem - maybe I need more.
1. They must not have a problem with alcohol. I don't mind if they drink socially, but it must not be an everyday necessity and when they do drink they must not be obsessed or difficult. I have dealt with too many drunks in my life to tolerate it in a partner.
2. They must have a good work ethic. Once again, I don't care what job they do, or even if they are sometimes unemployed. They must, however, not expect life to be handed to them and must believe in 'a hard days work for a good days pay'.
3. They must be a good citizen. This includes voting, not littering, not speeding. They mustn't drink and drive. They must take responsbility for their choices and acknowledge their behaviours. They mustn't park in handicapped spots or rip the welfare system off just because they can.
Is that too much to ask? I have NO physical specifications. I have no race, creed, background requirements. Obviously I would have reservations about dating someone with a string of marriages and a criminal record but hey .. I married one of those so I can't be too picky!
So is the problem that I am not forthright enough with them in what my boundaries are? I read somewhere "don't ever remove a fence until you remember why it was put up in the first place". I have decent boundaries with my friends, son, work colleagues and family - so why do I refuse/find it so difficult to establish boundaries with men in my life?
A shrink might suggest that I strive so hard to be low maintenance that I sell my soul in that pursuit. Perhaps I view myself as such a bad 'catch' for a man that I will tolerate almost anything in my gratitude for their company. This rings true - the last couple of "quasi-relationships" (read: fuck buddies) that I have had were flawed in many ways and it wasn't until I reached my absolute limit that I backed out. I propose that a woman with more self esteem and a greater sense of her value would have tolerated far less and probably wouldn't have associated with those guys in the first place.
There is also an underlying destruction factor. Maybe I avoid the 'decent ones' on purpose. This is found commonly in survivors of childhood abuse - this idea that they will not allow themselves to succeed and so they sabotage anything that could possibly go right for them. Who knows?
t.